Chapter 41: State Accountability and Feminicide

Book Publication

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This chapter centres on state actions and examines what governments do to protect women from gender-based violence through legislative actions and administrative strategies. We argue that Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua enacted feminicide laws in response to pressures from domestic women’s groups and from the international community to align with gender mainstreaming efforts such as those of the United Nations’ Fourth Conference on Women in Beijing (1994). The Central American case shows that feminicide laws and administrative actions (e.g., specialized courts and police) are ineffective in combating gender-based violence when these actions are taken in the context of broader structural inequalities that disfavour women. We argue, therefore, that these countries passed these laws and implemented administrative actions mainly to satisfy international agencies, as laws were flawed, and administrative efforts remained deeply underfunded. In addition, women’s grassroots organisations have pressured their governments from within while aligning with foreign NGOs to fund their activities to advance Central American women’s protection from violence.

External Authors

Cecilia Menjívar
Leydy Diossa-Jiménez

 

 


 

Interested in joining
our team? Questions
or comments?

Connect with us:  
twitter @femicidewatch

Imprint link icon & 
Privacy Policy link icon

Email us: editors (at)
femicide-watch.org

UNSA Global Network
UNSA Vienna

powered by
enlightenment GmbH

UNSA Vienna

UNSA GN

enlightenment logo